how i spent my summer vacation, or reflections on the fourth and freedom ticklers

back in the unseasonable warmth of february (hello, record temperatures)
i decided that turning my fourth of july into a five-day weekend would
be a good use of p.t.o.  this proved to be true, as i was later
invited to a friend’s family cabin with ten other lovely people that
very weekend.  we journeyed to the woods of wisconsin to drink
beer, eat meat, shoot fireworks, and dance to drake.

an excellent time was had by all, but there was a group consensus
based on pit stops for food, beer, and gas that small town wisconsinites
were not feeling us. like, really not feeling us.  i personally
felt i was getting more side eye than mary-kate olsen and olivier
sarkozy (probably) do strolling through the city of lights.  it
could just be paranoia brought on by certain aspects of rural midwestern
culture, despite the fact that i’ve come to expect them, such as the
ubiquitous anti-choice billboards. the first one i noticed was a little
different than most, in that it shared half its space with an ad for
cremation services, as if to say “we are constantly thinking this whole
(what we think is the) life cycle ALL THE WAY THROUGH.”

while we are certainly a lively bunch, we are also far from
obnoxious, our politeness and hygiene both impeccable.
 nevertheless, it felt as if we were immediately recognized as
liberal, city dwelling outsiders and subsequently treated with an air of
disdain.  what i imagined them thinking was something along the
lines of, “we’re red. you’re blue. and purple doesn’t exist in this
country, so we hate you.”

full disclosure, i’m smack dab in the middle of franzen’s freedom, so
competing notions of freedom and the uglier memories of the bush jr.
administration have been occupying my mind a bit more than usual lately.
 but even if that hadn’t been the case, the following picture of
what i found in a gas station ladies room still would have sent me right
back there:

sweet liberty

the french freedom tickler.  now, as i’m sure most of you
remember, back in 2003 when the u.s. decided to invade iraq, our french
friends were strongly opposed and expressed this opposition loudly in
the united nations.  this led to some americans boycotting french
goods and, to really drive their point home, alter the name of perhaps
our most beloved fried food, french fries, to freedom fries.  as
far as i know, this phenomenon was relatively short lived, but the
evidence of its existence still lives on in google image search:

would you like some freedom with that?

i can only imagine that the maker of the french freedom tickler
thought that, unlike with fries, to completely replace “french” with
“freedom” might prove too confusing for people, and they would pass on
buying it.  so what they did instead, that clever person, was put
the word “french” up in the corner, ablaze in the fire held by the very
statue that the french themselves gave us in 1886. how does that liberté
feel now?

“tickle her fancy with the real thing,” the tickler proclaims,
because everything real exists on american soil.  and just in case
you weren’t sure you were buying what you think you were buying adjacent
to the coin-operated condom dispenser, they put “adult novelty” at the
bottom.  for those of you who don’t know, this phrase is a rather
abhorrent one, because (in the united states) by selling products in
this particular category, you are entitled to all sorts of legal
loopholes that let you sell (cheap) toys that people insert into their
most private of parts containing b.p.a. and other shitty chemicals and
can also be totally porous and unsterilizable, allowing bacteria and
s.t.i.s to be fruitful and multiply (and, if you share them, shared!).
LET FREEDOM RING!

this trip to the ladies room made me sad at first, thinking that
perhaps the only “novelty” to speak of in this town was a sad,
heteronormative freedom tickler. then i remembered it’s the 21st century
and started to recall other things that made me think i shouldn’t fret
so.  like how there are a great number of sex toy stores that are
decent and don’t sell shitty toys and, most importantly, sell shit
online.  i thought back to my own days working in such an
establishment, and how i would smile a little when i would see that some
finely-crafted leather cuffs or high-quality dildo were being sent to
someone in bumfuck (pun intended) america. even target now sells a number of vibrators and (generally vibrating) cock rings in stores and online.

while this may or may not seem like a huge deal to you, i’m sure that
the people of alabama certainly appreciate it, seeing as how in
2009, the alabama supreme court upheld their ban on the sale of sex toys in
a 7-2 decision. so, you know, feel free to sell and stockpile weapons,
but pack up your leather harnesses and butt plugs and get the fuck out
of here.  this is what freedom sounds like in alabama:

public morality can still serve as a legitimate rational basis
for regulating commercial activity, which is not a private activity,”
associate justice michael f. bolin wrote in the majority opinion.

there is nothing `private’ or `consensual’ about the advertising and sale of a dildo,’” the majority opinion said.

after reflecting on ideas of sexual freedom in this country, i took a
moment to be grateful to live in a time and place where i can choose to
have sex only for recreation and not for procreation and can buy a
variety of birth control methods and sex toys, not to mention get an
abortion should that birth control fail.  this doesn’t mean that i
don’t hope for much, much better for the people of america when it comes
to having a nuanced and fully informed grasp of human sexuality, but i
do want to appreciate the battles that were fought to get us to where we
are now.

now, for the proof that i really was in wisconsin, the leinie lounger:

if my hair had been as long as it was a few weeks ago, i might have even tried a freedom braid:

birthdays, battles over truck nuts, and lessons from china.

it’s my birthday (26, holla!), and i’ve done a lot of long posts
the last few weeks, so i’m going to try to make this post short and
sweet.

yesterday morning, as i was recovering from a night of cheese curds,
tater tots, and deliciously hoppy beers, i was fortunate enough to have
seen the “american voices” section of the onion, which addressed the true but practically unbelievable story of a woman in south carolina who was fined $445 for hanging truck nuts and violating a constitutionally questionable local law:

tice was driving her pickup truck into a gas station when she was
pulled over by local police chief franco fuda and asked to remove a
pair of bright red testicles hanging from her trailer hitch. tice
refused and was subsequently slapped with a $445 fine for having
violated south carolina’s obscene bumper sticker law, which prohibits
vehicles from displaying stickers or devices “in a patently offensive way,
as determined by contemporary community standards, sexual acts,
excretory functions, or parts of the human body.” it should be noted
that, in florida, one can be fined $60 specifically for displaying truck nuts.

oh, and then it gets better:

berkeley county sheriff’s deputies took the chief of bonneau’s
police department to family court wednesday and held him there until he
came up with over $15,000 in overdue child support.

judge wayne creech found chief franco fuda in contempt of court
and gave him the chance to pay what he owed to an ex-wife in illinois
before sending him to berkeley county detention center, according to
court documents.

according to court records, fuda kept up with his $275 per-month
child support payments from december 1992, when his wife gained custody
of their infant son in their divorce, until january 2004, when his
payments became more sporadic. in june 2006, fuda stopped paying
altogether for at least three years, records state.

props to tice for standing her ground. even though i’ve always
thought truck nuts were stupid as hell, i admire her for knowing what
she wants on her damn automobile, and not letting some asshole, deadbeat
po-po make her take them off.

fly free

the second thing i wanted to share is an amazing picture that my
awesome friend and fearless former head teacher in korea, lisa, took on
her recent trip to china:

the cutest condom on earth

outside of maybe throwing in something about the importance of
consent, the caption of this amazing poster is about as simple a way
of  expressing how i feel about sex positivity that i could think
of: “sex is good, just play safe!” who knew china could put out rad,
sex-positive psas so much better than ours?

today, my best friend and super heroine, kara, is taking me out for a birthday lunch at tea house,
a very positively-reviewed chinese restaurant in town, where we are
going to share in some fish and pickled vegetables that is supposed to
be the best chinese meal in mpls.  as we eat it, i know that i am
going to be thinking fondly of china in a way that i maybe never have
before.

thank you, lisa, for taking that amazing photo and putting it on facebook : )

why i am walking in the slutwalk: betty and veronica would have wanted it this way

my last post
sparked a bit of discussion on the facebooks, (which i love, by the
way), and even though i felt like i addressed concerns people brought up
in various wall discussions sufficiently, i thought it might be best if
i just address some of them here, and explain more thoroughly why i
myself am super fucking excited about the mpls slutwalk. so here goes.

i grew up in a cool family of comic nerds.  while all three of
us enjoyed comics, my brother and i both shared a deep love of archie
comics.  shit is ridiculous, but we enjoyed the zany, implausible
adventures of archie and the gang.  it was some great escapism. i
am not going to say that there isn’t sexist material in archies, there
is, especially ones from the 1940s and 1950s, but allow me to point out
something very special about the world of riverdale.

the popularity of archie comics coincided with, and probably
reinforced, the rise of the american teenager as an identity category,
which was mostly based around their growing importance as a consumer
group.  so not surprisingly, there is a shit ton of shopping that
happens in archie comics, particularly with uber-wealthy veronica lodge
and her all-american bff/frenemy betty  cooper.  i loved betty
and veronica, especially betty, because unlike veronica, she was a
decent person and she’s an underdog (relatively speaking at least). i
even read the advice column that “they” wrote for those who would now be
called tweens,  yet another identity category formed around an age
group with a heartbeat and a disposable income.

betty and veronica were both extremely fashionable, and, above all
else, their style instilled in me an undying penchant for
miniskirts.  in middle school, i would buy them at express, back
when that store was just for the ladies and all the fellows had to go to
structure. after they made it home with me, i would never wear them,
except for in my room dancing with myself.

when i’ve  talked before
about wrestling with mainstream concepts of femininity during
adolescence, i did not mention that a fear of slut shaming was one of
the reasons why i attempted to make a fashion statement of men’s
polyester pants.  after all, what slut wears men’s polyester
pants?  me, it turns out.  as i said, they were also
surprisingly comfortable.  whatever my love of miniskirts, it was
not to be as a legitimate wardrobe choice for me until very recently.

if i had ever tried to wear miniskirts to middle or high school, i am
sure it would have gone badly.  i was a bit of a liberal outsider,
and still had some big time teenage awkwardness going on, so it really
wasn’t worth the risk to me at the time.  i can’t say for sure that
i would have been called a slut, seeing as i never took that risk, but
let’s just say that, based on the general lack of compassion and
intelligence i found in the student population, i had a feeling it would
just kind of be like that.

riverdale
is a fantasy world where girls don’t get called sluts, they don’t get
raped, and, for some reason, they think a goofy redhead with a brokeass
jalopy is super dreamy.  they get to be happy, life-embracing
girls, wear miniskirts if they want to, and rotate between spending time
with archie, reggie, and other guys who usually don’t make it to
another issue.

i truly believe that if i could step into riverdale and tell betty
and veronica about our real world, where girls get called sluts, they
get raped, and then get blamed for it because they were wearing a
miniskirt or are dating more than one guy, that they would be outraged
and would step out of riverdale and into minneapolis with me to walk in
the slutwalk. how could anyone, cartoon or not, deny the blood boiling
injustice there?

as a lady who wants to look good for herself, i personally am tired
of having this fear as a backdrop in my day to day life.  i want to
walk around minneapolis looking however i want, just like it was
riverdale, and never have to fear that my sweet outfit is going to be
used as someone’s justification for sexually assaulting me.

in my discussions with people online, and in a number of blogs i’ve
seen out there, it seems there are many people who, in spite of being
supportive of the concepts behind slutwalk and what it is trying to
accomplish, are not down with the name slutwalk.  while i am
certainly not going to tell anyone that they aren’t entitled to feel
that way, i would say to them that until we address “slut,” and other
words that are used by victim blamers, like “hussy,” “tramp,” “floozy,”
“harlot,” “trollop,” or “strumpet,” (some of these are a little dated,
but still), we are not going to make serious progress in changing rape
culture or people’s consciousness.

the very fact that people are so uncomfortable with having slut in
the title of the event is proof positive to me that we need to come
together and address the fear that we have of this word and really talk
it out.  ignoring the word is not going to strip it of the power
that it has in our society.

i have also noticed that there are a number of people who object to
the event because they don’t identify as a slut, so they feel like the
walk isn’t for them.  i say to them even if you never, ever want to
identify as a slut, wouldn’t you still want to live in a world where it
doesn’t have the power to cut people down and rationalize the sexual
assault they survived? and, just sayin’, not identifying as a slut will
not protect you from being raped.  that’s the old lie the toronto
police force was pushing, which is why this super important, awesome
movement got started to begin with.  straw, camel’s back, broken.

tiptoeing around slut is not going to result in substantial progress
for our collective human rights to safety and peace of mind.  
words are powerful, and their reappropriation does not happen
overnight.  it takes time.  just think about how long it took
to make strides in reappropriating queer. but the momentum that this,
now worldwide, movement has is going to have a big impact in getting
this long overdue discussion started for real.

i know that people who are not involved in the sex
positive/glbtqietc./queer/feminist communities might not feel like this
is an event that they would fit into, but i truly believe that the more
people that this event has, and the more diverse the group is, the
better the progress will be.  attending the event does not mean
that you have to identify as a slut.  you can spend your time
talking to other people about why the word makes you hurt, confused,
upset, angry, whatever.  come and let it out. get pissed with other
people who are fed up with a culture that encourages sexual violence.
get happy knowing there are other awesome people who have the social
awareness and drive to make this world safer and better for all of
us.  get dressed up however makes you feel comfortable and let’s
all dance together.  just come.  betty and veronica would want
you to.

 

 

 

 

playing on the dl: what outsports is trying to change

i’m not much of a sports person.  i played basketball for a
few years in elementary school, but it never really took, and soon
shifted to competitive dance.  however i still enjoy watching
basketball, and having competed on a team, i believe that teams are more
successful and function better when members of that team are encouraged
to be themselves and to bring their individual strengths to the game,
whatever that game may be.

this is related to a new york times article about a great website called outsports.com
outsports is a unique site that provides a forum for gay sports fans
and for closeted athletes and coaches to come out.   i imagine
it would be difficult to find anyone who would disagree that there are
few places in our culture, especially for men, where it is more
difficult to be openly gay than in a team sports setting.  the fact
that there are no “out major active male athletes” is quite shocking,
especially when you look at the numbers:

more than 3,500 men are on active rosters in major league
baseball, the n.f.l., the n.b.a. and the n.h.l. even if only 1 percent
of them are gay — and studies suggest the figure is several times
higher — at least several dozen would be on those rosters at any one
time.

what is also perplexing, is that while an out male professional
athlete has the elusiveness of a unicorn, when a professional female
athlete like sheryl swoopes of the w.n.b.a. comes out, there is very
little attention paid.  perhaps it’s because of enduring
stereotypes about women athletes being butch or lesbians, but the
variance still amazes me.

buzinski and zeigler, the two men who run the site, don’t believe
that at this point in time it is likely that an already established
professional athlete will come out and announce his sexuality. they said
that “the more likely situation would be for an openly gay high school
or college athlete to climb the ladder to the professional ranks.”
they also believe that a gay professional player would “be widely
accepted, even marketable.” it kills me to think about people marketing
someone’s sexuality in that context, regardless of the fact that
professional sports are only profitable because of marketing.  it
just leaves the gross taste of exploitation in my mouth.

i really recommend taking a look at outsports website because there are a lot of heartening, inspiring stories on there.  one i was particularly fond of is an article about three gay high school students who have started a blog to create a space for other young lgbtq athletes to find support amongst each other.

i also recommend watching this ellen interview with openly gay british rugby star gareth thomas, i watched it a few months ago and though it was really touching.

contribute to madame: help support mpls queer art and community!

i’ve been writing a post about my extensive thoughts on the
a-list new york reunion episode, however, due to snow emergency related
events, that post got sidetracked. which is totally fine because i have a
brief and much more important post for today.

madame is a new queer community art center on the south side of
minneapolis. they house some artist studios and host events, classes and
workshops. AND they need to raise $1000 for their deposit, very
quickly!

they have a profile on kickstarter that should be able to accept contributions very soon.  if you are in the mpls/st.paul metro area and you love:

a.)queer people

b.)queer community

c.)queer art/ists

d.)learning

e.)good times

then PLEASE contribute what you can to madame.  mpls is awesome,
and having a space like madame would only make it greater for everyone.

happy humpday everybody.

ultra gay, but not queer, hotels.

today, as i was doing some celebratory web surfing after finding out tom emmer is not going to be my governor,
i stumbled upon a story about how hotels are transitioning from gay
friendly hotels, to a niche market of  “ultra gay hotels,”
some of whom are “hetero-friendly.”

at first i was excited, but it was somewhat diminished after i saw
that a lot of these “ultra gay hotels” are really only marketed towards
highly toned and groomed gay men.  as i was reading about these
various up and coming establishments, i couldn’t help but think about
larry kramer’s novel faggots, which depicts in graphic detail
(and i mean to the extent of the amount of semen spilled on the dance
floor) the wild scene on fire island and in bathhouses and bars in
manhattan in the 70′s.  although kramer makes it clear that this
lifestyle is ultimately unfufilling for the protagonist, there is a
beauty in the freedom and lack of inhibition that existed in those
spaces.

so with that i can understand the appeal in creating an all gay male
hotel, where lots of cruising and flirtation can ensue.  however, i
think that it would be a mistake for them to put too much weight on the
assumption that “nongay travelers may feel uncomfortable staying there,
so these will always be niche businesses.”  as a lady who likes
other ladies and loves to keep queers in her company, but is also in a
loving, committed heterosexual relationship, i can say that i know other
women like me who would looooove to stay at a hotel with fine dining,
disco dancing, and large numbers of handsome gay men to dance
with.  i can really only speak for myself here, but if i had the
cash i would definitely break with my old lady sleep habits and stay out
until the wee hours if i could stay in a hotel like this in say, new
york.

i think it would be extra rad if hotels eventually expanded to serve
the tastes and needs of pansexuals and the non-monogamous, but i’m
guessing that could be decades away.  in the meantime, i will be
keeping my eye out for “hetero-friendly, ultra gay hotels with a disco”
to stay at.