Have YOU Changed Your Profile Picture For Marriage Equality?

Maybe I’m only Facebook friends with homies (it’s possible), but my entire timeline turned red and pink last week with equal signs in support of marriage equality as the Supreme Court discussed the constitutionality of Proposition 8 in California and the Defense of Marriage Act and legalizing same-sex marriage.

At some moments I was pleasantly surprised to see who of my peripheral friends “came out” in support of same-sex marriage. Other times I just wanted to vomit. Was Facebook going to send a tally of all those who changed their picture to SCOTUS? Who put forward the equal sign anyway? The answer is the Human Rights Campaign, whose logo is usually a yellow equal sign on a blue background.  For an awesome critique of the equal sign, read here: http://agnesgalore.tumblr.com/post/46709012222/why-i-almost-defriended-everyone-who-had-an-hrc-logo-as That post made me wonder about complacency, who speaks for who, and of course, White-washing, cis-washing and mono-sexual washing a movement, a group of people, an identity. What does it mean when my straight, cis friends who never expressed any interest in civil rights and human rights generally OR LGBTQ rights specifically change their avatar for a day or two? Should I be thanking them? Should I gag? Should I engage in a real conversation in Facebook comments?

 

And if you just want to look at some pink on red equal signs, look no further  http://www.buzzfeed.com/adambvary/21-fabulous-red-marriage-equality-profile-photos-on-facebook

The Queerest Super Bowl Ever? It’s Not That Simple

Trigger Warning: Homophobia, misogyny, transmisogyny and sex trafficking

transparentrainbowhelmet2This week, the internet happens to be all a-twitter about a marked change among pro-athletes “coming out” in support of LGBTQ rights and marriage equality. Denver Nuggets (Basketball, for all you readers like me who had to Google that) player Kenneth Faried spoke out in a video with his two mothers in support of civil unions and marriage equality. In football, Minnesota Viking Chris Kluwe wrote an open letter to Emmett C. Burns, Jr., another football player who opposed Baltimore Raven Brendon Ayanbadejo’s support of marriage equality. Upon knowing he was going to play in the Super Bowl, Ayanbadejo reached out to see how he could speak up against LGBTQ bullying and in support of LGBTQ rights.  Which brings us to Sunday…

This Sunday, February 3rd, 2013, is the Super Bowl. With all this buzz, it’s possible to think that this Super Bowl might be different, it might be Super Queer. But let’s not forget. This is also the time for traditionally sexist and homophobic and transphobic commercials (For example, this 2007 Snickers Ad- Trigger Warning), a time when beer and women’s bodies are sold in thirty-second slots. And children’s bodies too. Last year was the first time I read about the Super Bowl’s history of child sex trafficking, the largest child sex trafficking event in the U.S.

Maybe I’m too cynical, but I’m not sure how different things will really be this year. Will we see different commercials? Will commentators no longer resort to language rooted in homophobia and sexism? Will children no longer be trafficked for sex? Will mass consumption of beer and other booze go down and thus a decrease in Super Bowl-related domestic violence? Will the Destiny’s Child reunion lead to a threeway makeout session?  I can only hope so, but I wouldn’t count on it this year.

High 5! It’s 2013

Glenn BurkeHappy New Year! Did you know the high five was invented by Glenn Burke, the first openly gay major league baseball player? According to ESPN.com the high five was birthed late in the 1977 Dodgers season. Burke was on plate in the batting order following Dusty Baker, who had just hit his 30th home run and was coming around to home plate. When Baker ran past him, Burke lifted his hand, Baker did the same and their hands slapped, creating the first high five on record.

After being traded to the Oakland A’s in 1980 Burke faced a hostile work environment. Rumors of his sexuality followed him and the A’s manager, Billy Martin, called him a faggot. After a knee injury Burke felt there was no choice for him except early retirement.

The newly retired Burke took solace in playing gay softball and bringing the high-five to San Francisco’s Castro district. Jon Mooallem writes:

He became a star shortstop in a local gay softball league and dominated in the Gay Softball World Series. “I was making money playing ball and not having any fun,” he said of his time in the majors. “Now I’m not making money, but I’m having fun.” Jack McGowan, a friend in the Castro who has since passed away, once said of Burke: “He was a hero to us. He was athletic, clean cut, masculine. He was everything that we wanted to prove to the world that we could be.”

In the Castro, Burke’s creation of the high five was part of this Herculean mystique. He would regularly sit on the hood of a car — whichever one happened to be parked in front of a gay bar called the Pendulum Club — flash his magnetic smile and high-five everyone who walked by. In 1982, Burke came out publicly in an Inside Sports magazine profile called “The Double Life of a Gay Dodger.” The writer, a gay activist named Michael J. Smith, appropriated the high five as a defiant symbol of gay pride. Rising from the wreckage of Burke’s aborted baseball career, Smith wrote, was “a legacy of two men’s hands touching, high above their heads.”

Sports aren’t your thing? Celebrate the new year by making your own My Little Pony with General Zoi’s pony creator.

 

Married…On Facebook?

Facebook Relationship Statuses

Your numerous Facebook
relationship status options

I’m no statistician, but I would venture a guess that at least half of all relationships (open and non-open), marriages, engagements, and “it’s complicated”s on Facebook are fictional. On Facebook, a site informed by idealized projections and presentations self-mediated through a policy of hyper-openness, relationships and friendships are made instantly public.

I am particularly intrigued and troubled by the relationships of two female-identified friends. I am not alone in knowing two best friends who are “married” or “in an open relationship” on Facebook. Often, seeing two straight women claiming to be engaged to each other frustrates me. What a blatant unawareness of privilege! Why are they turning relationships between two women into a joke? Why do they joke about being married when they couldn’t even get married if they tried? Are they sure the notion of two women being in a romantic relationship is preposterous, so they aren’t even concerned with being misread? When I see those relationship statuses, I often feel silenced, erased, or mocked.

But maybe I judge too quickly. After all, there is something liberating about re-imagining relationships. Maybe marriages or open relationships are labels that fit certain friendships because of the emotional fulfillment that comes with those relationships. Perhaps these women are engaging in play and ambiguity in their relationships, blurring boundaries between friends and more, regardless of sexual or gender identity. Now, when I find myself frustrated, I try to check myself. Who am I to dictate what a relationship is? Maybe these two women feel like they are in an open relationship, where they are emotionally committed and find sexual satisfaction somewhere else. Or maybe they do find it within one another, and still identify as straight. Women in “fake” Facebook relationships, thank you for helping me pause and rethink public relationship presentations, as I push myself to redefine relationships for myself and how I read relationships onto others.

Halloween Horror: a Good Woman Is a Dead Woman

Already a week into October, it’s time to start thinking about what to be for Halloween. A lot of mainstream Halloween costumes are “sexy” lady-versions of traditionally men’s costumes: sexy cop, sexy Sherlock Holmes, sexy devil, etc. I don’t really have a problem with that — if you wanna wear what is essentially a cheap polyester bikini while you freeze your ass off at a party, go for it.

But where do I draw the line? At the Jane Doe DOA bodybag costume.

Jane Doe DOA Bodybag Halloween Costume

Because being an unidentified dead woman is hot.

The accompanying description completes the horrortainment:

He will be dead on arrival when you show up in this drop dead sexy Jane Doe DOA bodybag adult women’s costume. The dress hugs your every curve and the zipper… well, how low does it go? You decide! You can zip it all the way up and close the hood, or zip it down when he goes down.

It comes with a Jane Doe tag because the only thing better than being a dead lady in a short zipper dress is being an anonymous dead lady in a short zipper dress.

To be clear, I wouldn’t really have a problem with this costume being marketed in the context of fetish wear. If you get off being in, or pretending to be in, a body bag, get on with your bad self at your fetish ball or in the comfort of your own home. But once the context changes and the costume is marketed as a mainstream Halloween offering (as this one is), it carries with it strong social messages: a dead woman is a desirable woman, and the death of women in impersonal and potentially violent situations is so commonplace as to no longer be tragic.

how i spent my summer vacation, or reflections on the fourth and freedom ticklers

back in the unseasonable warmth of february (hello, record temperatures)
i decided that turning my fourth of july into a five-day weekend would
be a good use of p.t.o.  this proved to be true, as i was later
invited to a friend’s family cabin with ten other lovely people that
very weekend.  we journeyed to the woods of wisconsin to drink
beer, eat meat, shoot fireworks, and dance to drake.

an excellent time was had by all, but there was a group consensus
based on pit stops for food, beer, and gas that small town wisconsinites
were not feeling us. like, really not feeling us.  i personally
felt i was getting more side eye than mary-kate olsen and olivier
sarkozy (probably) do strolling through the city of lights.  it
could just be paranoia brought on by certain aspects of rural midwestern
culture, despite the fact that i’ve come to expect them, such as the
ubiquitous anti-choice billboards. the first one i noticed was a little
different than most, in that it shared half its space with an ad for
cremation services, as if to say “we are constantly thinking this whole
(what we think is the) life cycle ALL THE WAY THROUGH.”

while we are certainly a lively bunch, we are also far from
obnoxious, our politeness and hygiene both impeccable.
 nevertheless, it felt as if we were immediately recognized as
liberal, city dwelling outsiders and subsequently treated with an air of
disdain.  what i imagined them thinking was something along the
lines of, “we’re red. you’re blue. and purple doesn’t exist in this
country, so we hate you.”

full disclosure, i’m smack dab in the middle of franzen’s freedom, so
competing notions of freedom and the uglier memories of the bush jr.
administration have been occupying my mind a bit more than usual lately.
 but even if that hadn’t been the case, the following picture of
what i found in a gas station ladies room still would have sent me right
back there:

sweet liberty

the french freedom tickler.  now, as i’m sure most of you
remember, back in 2003 when the u.s. decided to invade iraq, our french
friends were strongly opposed and expressed this opposition loudly in
the united nations.  this led to some americans boycotting french
goods and, to really drive their point home, alter the name of perhaps
our most beloved fried food, french fries, to freedom fries.  as
far as i know, this phenomenon was relatively short lived, but the
evidence of its existence still lives on in google image search:

would you like some freedom with that?

i can only imagine that the maker of the french freedom tickler
thought that, unlike with fries, to completely replace “french” with
“freedom” might prove too confusing for people, and they would pass on
buying it.  so what they did instead, that clever person, was put
the word “french” up in the corner, ablaze in the fire held by the very
statue that the french themselves gave us in 1886. how does that liberté
feel now?

“tickle her fancy with the real thing,” the tickler proclaims,
because everything real exists on american soil.  and just in case
you weren’t sure you were buying what you think you were buying adjacent
to the coin-operated condom dispenser, they put “adult novelty” at the
bottom.  for those of you who don’t know, this phrase is a rather
abhorrent one, because (in the united states) by selling products in
this particular category, you are entitled to all sorts of legal
loopholes that let you sell (cheap) toys that people insert into their
most private of parts containing b.p.a. and other shitty chemicals and
can also be totally porous and unsterilizable, allowing bacteria and
s.t.i.s to be fruitful and multiply (and, if you share them, shared!).
LET FREEDOM RING!

this trip to the ladies room made me sad at first, thinking that
perhaps the only “novelty” to speak of in this town was a sad,
heteronormative freedom tickler. then i remembered it’s the 21st century
and started to recall other things that made me think i shouldn’t fret
so.  like how there are a great number of sex toy stores that are
decent and don’t sell shitty toys and, most importantly, sell shit
online.  i thought back to my own days working in such an
establishment, and how i would smile a little when i would see that some
finely-crafted leather cuffs or high-quality dildo were being sent to
someone in bumfuck (pun intended) america. even target now sells a number of vibrators and (generally vibrating) cock rings in stores and online.

while this may or may not seem like a huge deal to you, i’m sure that
the people of alabama certainly appreciate it, seeing as how in
2009, the alabama supreme court upheld their ban on the sale of sex toys in
a 7-2 decision. so, you know, feel free to sell and stockpile weapons,
but pack up your leather harnesses and butt plugs and get the fuck out
of here.  this is what freedom sounds like in alabama:

public morality can still serve as a legitimate rational basis
for regulating commercial activity, which is not a private activity,”
associate justice michael f. bolin wrote in the majority opinion.

there is nothing `private’ or `consensual’ about the advertising and sale of a dildo,’” the majority opinion said.

after reflecting on ideas of sexual freedom in this country, i took a
moment to be grateful to live in a time and place where i can choose to
have sex only for recreation and not for procreation and can buy a
variety of birth control methods and sex toys, not to mention get an
abortion should that birth control fail.  this doesn’t mean that i
don’t hope for much, much better for the people of america when it comes
to having a nuanced and fully informed grasp of human sexuality, but i
do want to appreciate the battles that were fought to get us to where we
are now.

now, for the proof that i really was in wisconsin, the leinie lounger:

if my hair had been as long as it was a few weeks ago, i might have even tried a freedom braid:

dear old dad: how television reflects the shifting landscape of child care

last week, when i was at the y, catching bits of cnn between
reading “who wore it best” and  ”celebrities: they’re just like
us!” like i do, i caught this story about the rise in number of stay-at-home dads:

among fathers with a wife in the workforce, 32% took care of
their kids at least one day a week in 2010, according to the u.s. census
bureau, which looked at families with children under 15 years old.
that’s up from 26% in 2002.

of those with kids under the age of 5, 20% of dads in 2010 were the primary caretaker.

many find that having one parent at home does have its advantages, especially as child care costs continue to climb.

couples do the math and realize that it makes more financial
sense for one spouse to stay home with the kids. and while it’s often
the woman who decides to drop out of the workforce, more men are taking on the responsibility of child care as well.

seeing this story compelled me to write about something i’ve been
thinking a lot about since the fall, which is the exciting and
well-executed reflection of this shifting reality in the domestic sphere
on television.

up all night has done a tremendous job of illuminating both
the universal challenges of new parenthood and those that are more
specific to new stay-at-home dads trying to create an identity for
themselves in a society that still genders child care and other domestic
work as “feminine” versus gender-neutral adjectives, such as nurturing
or supportive.

in up all night, will arnett plays chris brinkley, a former
lawyer and full-time stay-at-home dad to his new daughter, amy.
 christina applegate plays his wife, reagan, a driven producer for
the oprah-like television show ava.  maya rudolph wows as
the nutty and endearing ava alexander.  the show was based on the
experiences of its creator, emily spivey, and the trials of creating
work-life balance when she went back to working for snl after giving birth to a baby boy.

overall, chris handles the stresses of parenthood in stride.  he
brings amy to the studio to visit reagan and finds community with other
parents at early childhood education classes (see “mr bob’s toddler kaleidoscope“).

one of my favorite episodes is “working late and working it,”
where chris wants to get reagan back in the mood for love, but his
attempts still leave her slipping into maternity jeans after long days
at work.  chris looks to his new hip friend, reed (played by will forte of 30 rock and snl fame),
for advice.  chris doesn’t want to ask reagan directly to spice up
her look at home, so reed tells chris that if he wants to see sexy, he
needs to lead by example and “put sexy out there,” which leads to a
hilarious living room critique of chris’ wardrobe, underwear included.
the ever-enthusiastic chris ultimately fails when he “brings it on the
sexy front, but blows it on the subtle part” and pisses off reagan.

the study that cnn was discussing, however, does not include the
growing number of families with two fathers, where, inevitably, if one
parent stays home, it will be a father.  modern family, one of my favorite shows, features such a family with cameron, mitchell, and lily.  in this clip,
cam and mitch are discussing lily’s problem with biting people, and
snappy dialogue ensues after mitch suggests cam is to blame, because
he’s the one who is home with her all day.

one of my favorite episodes that centers around cam and mitch’s
parenting is season 1 episode 2, “the bicycle thief.”  they are
taking lily to her first toddler play group, and mitch is concerned that
they’ll be judged for being the only gay parents, so he asks cam to
tone it down a little.  naturally, cam trying to conceal his true
personality results in him being quite awkward, like when he says, “i’m
cameron, and i’m not currently working….which gives me more time to
grill and shoot baskets.”

ultimately, after another gay couple shows up, unconcerned about
seeming flamboyant, mitch loosens up, and even lets cam slap his own
butt during the “hello dance” so he can “make his horsey go.”

one reason that i’m glad i waited on this post was so that i could
mention another notable instance of men in child care on t.v.
 mid-season on new girl, unemployed winston is trying
to network at schmidt’s holiday work party.  he finds himself
talking to schmidt’s boss’s son, elvin, a precocious and notoriously
unfriendly boy. his mother is so impressed that elvin has taken a liking
to winston that she offers him a nannying job on the spot.  he
takes the position, although, eventually, elvin decides that winston
needs to push himself more towards his career goals and lies to his
mother about winston smoking pot to get him fired so he’ll have to find a
new job.  short lived, but still, it’s nice to see a man nanny on
t.v. for once.

hopefully, as time goes on and attitudes get more progressive,
representations of men in positions of caretaking and nurturing roles
will become more abundant and nuanced.  if we want to become more
functional as a society, promoting the idea that anyone, regardless of
sex, gender, or orientation, is capable of providing care, love, and
protection will serve us all greatly.

More Ryan Heffington Less Gender Enforcement

I watch a-lot of Hulu and therefore a-lot of Hulu commercials.
Commercials that enforce gender stereotypes are so common I rarely think
to comment on them, but this commercial for the Samsung Focus Flash
struck me as extra offensive because of how aggressively it tells
audiences to conform to their gender or face public social media
humiliation.

The commercial goes like this: Two dudes “banter” with each other.
Dude One posts a video of Dude Two crying in a movie theater to
humiliate him. When Dude Two retaliates by asking him about things he
saw on facebook related to his girlfriend, Dude One ups the ante,
threatening to post a video of him wearing a shower cap and (possibly
shaving his legs?) in the bathtub.

I don’t really get the point of this commercial. Is it that you can
ruin your friend’s lives faster with the new Samsung Focus Flash? Is it
about how easy it is to film people without their consent on your new
phone?

One direct antidote to this kind of depressing, shitty advertising is
Ryan Heffington and his followers. I was first introduced to Heffington
on RuPaul’s drag race where he teaches a small group of final
contestants choreography for a RuPaul video. I loved his style and his
attitude. There is something about someone who is rocking heels and a
mustache that just fills me with delight. I think it’s knowing that they
are being exactly who they want to be.

After investigating Heffington further I found out about Sweaty Sundays
and Wet Wednesdays, classes where dancers follow his lead, dressing
creatively in short shorts, unitards, day-glo spandex, sweatbands, and
whatever else they might be inspired to wear. (Check out this youtube video of them dancing to a great Gossip remix)

Picture from the NY Times article ‘Dig Out the Spandex and Feel the Burn’

In an interview with LA Weekly
Heffington said, “What we do is celebratory. By the end of class,
everyone’s personalities are lighter. It’s not yoga, where you focus on
yourself. It’s a group effort and everyone’s simultaneously releasing
this magic that I couldn’t give by myself.”

No one is freaking out because they cry at movies or shave their
legs. They’re out there owning that shit and dancing their hangovers off
on Sunday morning! What a sad, narrow little world people confine
themselves to when they listen to advertising. Fuck advertising*, and
release some magic instead.

*Ok, don’t fuck all advertising. Some advertising is amazing. So really, fuck shallow stupid self-hate generating advertising.

Internet Round-up: Stuff Cis People Say, Lesbian Parenting Survey, and the Future According to Tatchell

I hate it when I’m busy but there are so many possible things to
blog about. Enter the internet round-up,  a way to post stuff, but
not really, you know? Basically I’m turning my blog posts into Tumblr
until I’m down to two jobs again. So what have I been checking out on
the internets the last couple of days?

1. Peter Tatchell, a long-time GLBTI activist from Britain, posted an article
on Huffington Post UK talking about how the future of sex will move
beyond straight and gay. Tatchell says, “This picture of human sexuality
is much more complex, diverse and blurred than the traditional
simplistic binary image of hetero and homo, so loved by straight
moralists and – equally significantly – by many lesbians and gay men.

If sexual orientation has a culturally-influenced element of
indeterminacy and flexibility, then the present forms of homosexuality
and heterosexuality are conditional. They are unlikely to remain the
same in perpetuity. As culture changes, so will expressions of
sexuality.”

I couldn’t agree more.

2. Lesbian households produce a child abuse rate of 0%. Awesome. This was reported by Feministing based on a study by the National Longitudinal Lesbian Family Study.

3. Stuff _______people say to _____ people has become a meme I’ve been seeing more of lately, especially on Youtube. TransFix brings you: Stuff cis people say to trans people. Enjoy!