Halloween Horror: a Good Woman Is a Dead Woman

Already a week into October, it’s time to start thinking about what to be for Halloween. A lot of mainstream Halloween costumes are “sexy” lady-versions of traditionally men’s costumes: sexy cop, sexy Sherlock Holmes, sexy devil, etc. I don’t really have a problem with that — if you wanna wear what is essentially a cheap polyester bikini while you freeze your ass off at a party, go for it.

But where do I draw the line? At the Jane Doe DOA bodybag costume.

Jane Doe DOA Bodybag Halloween Costume

Because being an unidentified dead woman is hot.

The accompanying description completes the horrortainment:

He will be dead on arrival when you show up in this drop dead sexy Jane Doe DOA bodybag adult women’s costume. The dress hugs your every curve and the zipper… well, how low does it go? You decide! You can zip it all the way up and close the hood, or zip it down when he goes down.

It comes with a Jane Doe tag because the only thing better than being a dead lady in a short zipper dress is being an anonymous dead lady in a short zipper dress.

To be clear, I wouldn’t really have a problem with this costume being marketed in the context of fetish wear. If you get off being in, or pretending to be in, a body bag, get on with your bad self at your fetish ball or in the comfort of your own home. But once the context changes and the costume is marketed as a mainstream Halloween offering (as this one is), it carries with it strong social messages: a dead woman is a desirable woman, and the death of women in impersonal and potentially violent situations is so commonplace as to no longer be tragic.

Is Obama our first gay president? Nope, we’ve already had a couple queer men in the Oval Office (and at least one in the Cabinet)

Newsweek cover - Obama as first gay president

The Newsweek cover image

This week’s edition of Newsweek, with is it’s poorly photoshopped cover declaring Barack Obama our first gay president, has caused quite a stir.
The reference is itself sensationalistic and dumb, playing on the
notion of Bill Clinton being our first black president. Too bad, too,
since the discussion about Newsweek’s cover distracts from the
interesting article by Andrew Sullivan inside the magazine.

Okay, so Newsweek didn’t mean for us to take it literally. But it didn’t take long for outlets like Daily Kos and Salon to point out that not only is Obama not gay, our first gay president was most likely James Buchanan. And his presumed lover? Our first gay vice president, Rufus King. And Obama is not (even nominally) our second gay president as that title most likely belongs to Abe Lincoln. As long as we’re on a gay civics lesson, which Federalist was queer? Alexander Hamilton,
our first bisexual cabinet member. To find out more about these queer
18th and 19th century politicians, follow the links below:

Read more about our first gay president and our first gay vice president, James Buchanan and Rufus King.

Read more about our second gay/queer president, Abraham Lincoln.

Read more about our first queer cabinet member, Alexander Hamilton.

There have always been queer people and their will always be queer
people. That some of our presidents or early statesmen enjoyed the
affections of other men should really come as no surprise.

The first queer Cabinet member? Alexander Hamilton.

The Alexander Hamilton & John Laurens Statue in Lafayette Park, Philadelphia

Hamilton & Laurens together again

Today I happened to see the new issue of Gay and Lesbian Review, in which historian Michael Aubrecht presents the evidence
that Alexander Hamilton, the first Secretary of the Treasury and
notorious playboy, was most likely bisexual. Letters between Hamilton
and the soldier and statesman John Laurens suggest the two men may have
had an intimate relationship. In the excerpt below, Hamilton reassures
Laurens that despite his upcoming wedding to his fiancée, Elizabeth
Schuyler, his love for Laurens remains:

In spite of Schylers black eyes, I have still a part for the public and another for you; so your impatience to have me married is misplaced; a strange cure by the way, as if after matrimony I was to be less devoted than I am now. Let me tell you, that I intend to restore the empire of Hymen and that Cupid is to be his prime Minister. I wish you were at liberty to transgress the bounds of Pennsylvania. I would invite you after the fall to Albany to be witness to the final consummation. My Mistress is a good girl, and already loves you because I have told her you are a clever fellow and my friend; but mind, she loves you a l’americaine not a la françoise [sic].
Adieu, be happy, and let friendship between us be more
than a name.
A Hamilton
The General & all the lads send you their love.

Historian Bob Arnebeck interprets the letter from Hamilton: “In
the extant letters, this is the last of Hamilton’s homoerotic bravado
with Laurens. But it is quite enough to allow us to label Hamilton as a
man with a wide appetite for pleasures that comfortably included
homosexuality. Marriage would be no cure for his love for Laurens.” A
statue of the two men stand in Lafayette Park in Philadelphia, a
testament to their friendship.

 

Return to the main article.

Read about our first gay president and first gay vice president, James Buchanan and Rufus King.

Read about our second gay/queer president, Abraham Lincoln.

The second gay/queer president? Abraham Lincoln.

Abraham Lincoln & Joshua Speed

Young love? Abraham Lincoln & Joshua Speed

Some historians believe that Buchanan wasn’t our only queer
president. And which president do they debate about? None other than Abraham Lincoln. While sharing beds was common in Lincoln’s time, Keith Stern, author of Queers in History, takes exception with the suggestion that Lincoln and shopkeeper Joshua Speed sharing a bed for four years was typical:

Some historians note that it was common
for men to share beds in those days, there was a shortage of beds. 
But they fail to recognize that many of those men were also lovers.

It’s true, there was a shortage of beds,
and as men traveled around they might arrive at a roadside inn where
there was lack of space, so they might be forced to share a room or even
a bed with one or two other men.  There were many jokes about what
went on in those shared beds too.

But it was unusual for two adult men to happily sleep together at home for so long the way that Abe and Josh did….

Nearly four years later, on January 1,
1841, Abe learned that Josh was leaving him and going back to his native
Kentucky.  Abe was devastated and suffered symptoms of what today
we would call a nervous breakdown, an episode known to historians as
Lincoln’s “fatal first.”… By the way, there is not a shred of evidence
to support the contention of some historians that Lincoln also broke off
an engagement with Mary Todd or suffered any of the other myriad
setbacks that some have postulated to explain what upset him on that
fateful day, other than the well-documented impending separation from
Speed….

As Abe grew older he continued to have
intimate relationships with men…. Even as president, Lincoln formed a
close attachment to a soldier, Captain David V. Derickson, who was the
commander of his guards.  In 1862 and 1863, they shared a bed in
the White House and a getaway cottage at the outskirts of town. 
Believe me, there were plenty of extra beds in the White House.

Lincoln’s same-sex relationships did not
go unnoticed by contemporaries and early biographers. Virginia Woodbury
Fox, a well-connected Washingtonian, wrote in an 1862 diary entry:

“Tish says, ‘there is a Bucktail
Soldier here devoted to the President, drives with him, and when Mrs L.
is not home, sleeps with him.’ What stuff!”

Even thirty-three years later, Thomas
Chamberlain, one of Lincoln’s bodyguards, remembered the relationship of
the two men when he wrote a history of the regiment:

“Captain Derickson, in particular,
advanced so far in the President’s confidence and esteem that, in Mrs.
Lincoln’s absence, he frequently spent the night at his cottage,
sleeping in the same bed with him, and — it is said — making use of His
Excellency’s night-shirt!”

Scandalous stuff.  Some historians
like to say these observers were not implying a sexual relationship,
only that the two men were good friends, and it was perhaps slightly
improper for a common soldier to become so close to the President. 
But the fact that people of the time invariably noted the men slept
together only when Mrs. Lincoln was not around, indicates to me that
they had an inkling what was going on — they were aware that the
relationship was somehow hidden from and perhaps a substitute for
Lincoln’s terrible marriage to Mary Todd….

We will likely never know for sure if
Abraham Lincoln had sexual relations with those men.  But it seems
clear he had a passionate desire for intimacy with men to an extent that
attracted notice among the people who knew him.

(For more information on what other historians think, the Wikipedia article on Lincoln’s sexuality summarizes the arguments of both historians who suggest Lincoln was queer and historians who find this idea preposterous.)

 

Return to the main article.

Read about our first gay president and our first gay vice president, James Buchanan and Rufus King.

Read about our first queer Cabinet member, Alexander Hamilton.

The first gay president? James Buchanan. The first gay vice president? Rufus King.

James Buchanan

James Buchanan

Some historians believe that Buchanan, our only bachelor president,
may have had an intimate relationship with Rufus King, our only bachelor
vice president. A blog post at Presidential History Geeks writes about the open-secret relationship between the two men:

While in Washington, Buchanan’s “room
mate” was Senator Rufus King. The two men were virtually inseparable and
were rumored to be lovers.They shared a house and a bedroom (this
apparently was not uncommon for the time.) Many openly wrote and spoke
this accusation. For example, Tennessee Governor Aaron Brown was sent to
Washington as an advance man for President-Elect Polk, and wrote Polk
back, describing King as Buchanan’s “better half” and as “Aunt Nancy” (a
derogatory term for homosexuals). Although Buchanan was unmarried,
Brown writes to Polk: “General Saunders, in the presence of Mr. Buchanan
and his wife and some others, advanced the opinion that
neither Mr. Calhoun nor Mr. Van Buren had any chance to be elected…and
being asked by someone, who then can be, he forgot himself and said that
Colonel Polk could run better than any man in the nation. This of
course was highly indecorous toward Mrs. B.” Former President Andrew
Jackson would also refer to Rufus King as “Miss Nancy” and “Aunt Fancy”,
both being derogatory terms for gay men in the 19th century.

Rufus King (image by Matthew Brady)

Rufus King (image by Matthew Brady)

In my opinion, the most interesting evidence of Buchanan’s
homosexuality is an excerpt of a letter he wrote to a female friend
after King left the States to become the ambassador to France:

“I am now solitary and alone having no
companion in the house with me. I have gone wooing to several gentlemen
but have not succeeded with any of them. I feel that it is not good for
man to be alone, and I should not be astonished to find myself married
to some old maid who can nurse me when I am sick, provide good dinners
for me when I am well, and not expect from me any very ardent or
romantic affection.”

 

Return to the main article.

Read about our second gay/queer president, Abraham Lincoln.

Read about our first queer Cabinet member, Alexander Hamilton.

Earth to Romney: Punishing Kids for Transgressing Gender Norms IS “Anti-Gay Bullying”

The Forcible Haircut

Mitt Romney in the Cranbrook yearbook

Mitt Romney in the Cranbrook yearbook: “Give a guy enough rope and he’ll hang himself.” (Photo credit: The New York Times)

The Washington Post
wrote this week about Mitt Romney’s time at the Cranbrook prep school,
highlighting an incident in which Romney led a group in assaulting a
fellow student. When Romney saw soft-spoken new student John Lauber with
bleach-blond hair hanging over one eye, Romney told his friend, “He can’t look like that. That’s wrong. Just look at him!”
Later Romney led his friends to Lauber’s dorm room where they held down
the terrified student while Romney hacked at Lauber’s hair with
scissors. Lauber was crying and screaming for help. The Washington Post
verified the story by independently interviewing five people who were
students at Cranbrook at the time and who witnessed or participated in
the assault. After Lauber was attacked by Romney and his friends,
“Lauber seemed to disappear. He returned days later with his shortened
hair back to its natural brown. He finished the year but ultimately left
the school before graduation — thrown out for smoking a cigarette.”
(Lauber’s sisters disagree that he allowed his hair to return to it’s
natural color, saying “he never stopped bleaching it,” keeping blond
hair until his death from liver cancer in 2004.)

Romney’s Response

When the Washington Post story broke, Romney’s campaign said that he
had no memory of the incident. (Contrast this with the interviews with
the other men involved in the attack who were later horrified at their
own behavior, some of them apologizing to Lauber. Phillip Maxwell, who
helped hold Lauber down while Romney cut Lauber’s hair, questions if
Romney has truly forgotten the attack. Maxwell told the New York Times,
“I would think this would be seared in his memory…. Certainly for the
other people that were involved, nobody has forgotten.”) Then Romney
gave a weak apology in an interview on a Fox News radio show:

“Back in high school, I did some dumb things, and if
anybody was hurt by that or offended, obviously I apologize for
that. I participated in a lot of hijinks and pranks during high
school, and some might have gone too far, and for that I apologize…”

Why does that apology sound so insincere? Because it’s conditional.
It only kicks in as an apology if one happens to be hurt or offended,
never mind just assuming that when someone is bullied and physically
assaulted that people (especially the victim) are both hurt and
offended. Romney then takes issue with the article for portraying
Lauber as a target for such “hijinks” because of, according to the
Washington Post, Lauber’s “nonconformity and presumed homosexuality”:

I certainly don’t believe that I thought the fellow was homosexual. That was the furthest thing from our minds back in the 1960s, so that was not the case.”

What Romney Doesn’t Get

Here’s what Romney doesn’t get about anti-gay bullying: he assumes
that if the bully didn’t know or even presume that the victim was gay
that it’s not “anti-gay bullying,” it’s just “hijinks.” There are many
out queer students who are bullied every day because of their sexual
orientation. And there are many students who are bullied every day
because they are presumed to be queer. Some of those presumed to be
queer are straight and others come out later in life (as John Lauber
did). This happens today and it happened when Romney was a teenager. And
in the past, when sexual orientation and gender identity were less
openly discussed (and identity politics as we know it had yet to emerge)
much of the bullying that went on was not tied to a named identity
assigned to the victim. While homosexuality was not the furthest thing
from everyone’s minds in the 1960s, I do believe Romney when he says that it was the furthest thing from his mind. From Romney’s heterocentic viewpoint, he couldn’t
conceive of the possibility of Lauber being gay. But just because
Romney didn’t presume Lauber’s homosexuality doesn’t mean that his
assault on Lauber shouldn’t be considered under the umbrella of
“anti-gay bullying.” Romney may not have attached Lauber’s gender presentation to a sexual orientation, but that doesn’t change why Romney bullied him: Romney assaulted Lauber for transgressing gender norms (as defined by Romney.)
In the end, it doesn’t matter if Lauber was gay or if Romney presumed
he was gay; Romney attacked Lauber because of his flamboyant gender
presentation (“He can’t look like that. That’s wrong.”), and that’s
anti-gay bullying.

International Day of They: Resurrecting the Use of “They” as a Singular Pronoun

You don't think "they" can be used as a singular pronoun? HAHAHAHA.

The Llama Will Show You

Thursday, May 3, 2012, is the first annual (hopefully) International
Day of They-ing. The day was created by Minnesotan linguist Ryan Txanson and consists (so far) entirely of a Facebook invitation.
The invitation is public and anyone with a Facebook account can join
the “event,” thereby pledging that on May 3rd, every time you refer to
someone in the 3rd person you will use the pronoun “they” (not “he” or
“she”). I encourage you to take part: whether you’re a gender outlaw or
just someone who hates the awkward (and exclusionary) phrase “he or
she,” you’ll find freedom in the warm embrace of singular “they.”

Why use “they” as a singular pronoun? Because it’s not gendered, it should be used whenever the gender of the person is unknown or
irrelevant. Here’s an example by Oscar Wilde: “Experience is the name
everyone gives to their mistakes.” (Notice that Wilde didn’t say “his
mistakes” or “his or her mistakes.”) For some of us, the International
Day of They (I think that’s more catchy than “They-ing”) is an
affirmation of the linguistic choices we already make, and for others of
us using “they” this way sounds odd or ungrammatical. While some style
guides like the Chicago Manual of Style still frown upon the singular use of “they” in formal writing, other style guides and grammar experts encourage such use (Grammar Girl, New Fowler’s Modern English Usage, Merriam-Webster Collegiate Dictionary, and the Random House Dictionary).

But using “they” as a singular pronoun is nothing new. Historians
have found the word used this way as far back as the 14th century. And
it was not until the late 18th and early 19th centuries that grammarians
decided that singular “they” did not accord with the grammar rules that
they had borrowed from Latin and were applying to English. So, if on
May 3rd you use “they” as a singular, generic pronoun, you will be in
the good company of authors such as Jane Austen, Shakespeare, Thackeray,Whitman, and Dickens.

What is new is using “they” to refer to a known (not generic or hypothetical) individual in order to avoid the gendered pronouns “he” or “she.” This is the exciting and revolutionary part of the International Day of They!
It’s okay to say, for example, “Hollis got their first guitar when they
were eight.” Previous attempts to insert new non-gendered pronouns into
English (like “zie” and “hir”) have been made for hundreds of years,
and they have all failed. What is more likely to succeed is the
expansion of the existing “they” to meet the needs of gender-neutral
language. How do we change language and then push those changes into the
mainstream? Use. We have to use it the way we want it to be. And then
we have to keep using it to establish credibility and authority.

For me the International Day of They is personal (and personally
validating); “They”/ “Their”/ “Them”/ “Themself” are my preferred gender
pronouns (PGPs). I will be making a point on May 3rd to use “they” for all
3rd persons, both generic and specific. Please join me. And if you’re
skeptical about the ability to change something so entrenched in
language as pronouns, I ask you, when was the last time you used “thy,”
“thee,” or “thou”?

Melissa Harris-Perry’s ground-breaking national conversation on trans issues

Today the Melissa Harris-Perry show on MSNBC raised the bar on
the national media’s presentation of trans issues. Across two segments,
Harris-Perry devoted almost an hour to trans activism: it was the first
time I’ve seen that kind of time devoted to trans issues without solely
focusing on the narrative of one individual. In the first segment,
Harris-Perry and her panelists, including the wonderful Kate Bornstein, discuss the intersection of identity politics and activism.

But, for me, the most amazing part of the show is right at the
beginning, when Melissa Harris-Perry comes out as cisgender. What a
watershed moment! I don’t think cisgender has ever been defined on
national TV, and it was so refreshing to see the definition coming from a
cisgendered person instead of an “educating” transperson. In her
introductory remarks, she said:

I’m black. I’m a woman. And I’m cis… being cis means that
the sex of the body I was born with, the gender I was assigned at
birth, and my personal identity all match. And being cis does not make
me “normal” or “natural”; it just makes me, well, cis.

You can watch the first trans-related segment of the show below:

On the second trans-related segment of the show, Harris-Perry and her
panelists discussed the Obama Administration’s inconsistent application
of LGBT anti-discrimination policy. While the U.S. Housing and Urban
Development Department (HUD) issued a rule barring LGBT housing
discrimination by any landlord or entity handling HUD funds, the White
House will not currently sign an executive order requiring federal
contractors to follow a similar LGBT employment discrimination policy.

If you’d like, you can read the new HUD rule.
What’s so amazing about this rule is that it not only bans those
receiving HUD funds from discriminating against housing applicants on
the basis of perceived sexual orientation or gender identity, it bans
both those who have FHA loans and FHA lenders from doing the same thing.

Here’s the second segment of the Melissa Harris-Perry show discussion of trans issues, focusing on the new HUD rule:

Thank you, Melissa Harris-Perry, for hosting intelligent, in-depth conversations about trans realities and politics.

Visibility Round-up: trans* and androgynous imagery on Tumblr & Pinterest

tumblr_on_blue_largeI know I’m late to the game, but I’ve been discovering the awesome trans*, queer, and androgynous content on Tumblr. If you’re feeling a little invisible or need some community support, I’d suggest checking out these Tumblr blogs:

The last two, MTF Butches and Femme FTM,
are particularly worth checking out because they provide much needed
visibility and validation for trans-identified folks who buck the
presentation “norms” of their  gender. These blogs are a blessing
for all of us who have felt ourselves acutely aware of our gender
identity and gender presentation moving along independent axises.

Pinterest_Logo-300x75

So despite having been around since 2010, Pinterest is suddenly the hot new social networking site, recently becoming the fastest-growing stand-alone Web site in history. Although they’re small, there are a few boards on Pinterest posting trans* and androgynous imagery:

Many of these boards have yet to be fully developed, and I’m excited
to watch them grow. And I’m not surprised that the most frequently
duplicated image across the boards is this photo of friend of The Queer
and Now, Jiz Lee:

Jiz Lee: The Common Denominator

What are you looking at on Pinterest and Tumblr? Let us know in the comments below!

UPDATE:

Thanks to Jiz Lee for letting us know via Twitter that Crash Pad Series has a presence on Pinterest and Tumblr:
Crash Pad Series Pinterest
Crash Pad Series Tumblr

If you’re not familiar with the Crash Pad Series, it’s an awesome queer porn site by the wonderful Shine Louise Houston.

And if you’re not already following The Queer and Now on Twitter, you should!

Switcharoo: Hana Pesut’s Photo Project

Recently I came across the Switcharoo project by Canadian photographer Hana Pesut.
Hana takes couples or small groups and photographs them in their
typical clothes. Then she has everyone switch clothes and takes another
photo. The resulting side-by-side set is a whimsical double portrait.

I couldn’t find an artist’s statement about the project, so I don’t
know what the photographer’s intentions are. What I find so fascinating
about the project is how similar the photos look — by switching clothes,
one can see the gender performance that the clothes require of their
wearers. When I look at the photos, I see the similarities between the
people, and it’s easier to tease out what qualities are attached to the clothes themselves.

What do you see in these photos?

Vij & Andy portrait

Vij & Andy

Jodi & Rob portrait

Jodi & Rob

Pam & Bruce portrait

Pam & Bruce

Kristy & Brennan portait

Kristy & Brennan

Jen & Corey portrait

Jen & Corey

Christina & Phil portrait

Christina & Phil

Mish & Colin portrait

Mish & Colin

Matt & Stormey portrait

Matt & Stormey

Maryanne & Dmitry portrait

Maryanne & Dmitry

Katina & Jerry portrait

Katina & Jerry

Julia & Matthew portrait

Julia & Matthew

Dustin & Shmoo portrait

Dustin & Shmoo

Chad & Jessica portrait

Chad & Jessica

Leila & Azim portrait

Leila & Azim