the fbi steps into the 21st century by acknowledging that men can be raped too

file this under “thank fucking god” and “how had this not already happened?”.   after over 80 years of existence, the fbi has finally changed its definition of rape to include male victims,
“ a change that will bring more accurate counts of male rape and
provide better resources to victims.”  their new definition
“describes rape as any kind of forced penetration.”  this
definition still seems fairly limited to me, but i guess if that is
somehow useful in distinguishing between rape and other sexual assault,
then okay.

it blows me away that the idea that men can’t be raped has pervaded
for so long  and, i think, underscores how much work there is to be
done in giving masculinity a proper breakdown and deconstruction the
way that femininity has had over the past few decades.  the idea
that men can’t be raped assumes a couple of falsehoods about men that
are constantly perpetuated in our society : a.) men always want sex,
therefore they could never be raped and b.) men always want sex,
therefore they want to sleep with virtually anyone and could never be
raped.  this, to me, has functioned as a sort of (different but
equally fucked up) gender-based victim blaming.  hopefully as men
continue to be recognized as rape survivors and receive badly-needed
support, the movement to end victim blaming and rape culture will really
take hold.

an anti-rape campaign from the california department of health services 
is reflective of how our culture is changing in its perception and
definition of  rape and now features posters with two men and the
message, “so when I wanted to and he didn’t, WE DIDN’T.”

*side note about all of the “my strength posters.” i really wish you guys had made these people look happy. rape didn’t
happen, for crying out loud. let’s make that seem like a great fucking
thing, shall we?  right now, you’re running the risk of your
audience perceiving the men in the poster as being irritated (or at
best, indifferent) over the fact that they didn’t rape their partner.
 maybe you were afraid that showing happy people might somehow
undermine the seriousness of rape, but if we’re going to become a
functional, sex-positive society, we need to get seriously happy about
consent and show some beaming couples being like, “fuck yeah, we respect
each other’s boundaries and don’t violate each other!” just sayin’.


 

Internet Round-up: Stuff Cis People Say, Lesbian Parenting Survey, and the Future According to Tatchell

I hate it when I’m busy but there are so many possible things to
blog about. Enter the internet round-up,  a way to post stuff, but
not really, you know? Basically I’m turning my blog posts into Tumblr
until I’m down to two jobs again. So what have I been checking out on
the internets the last couple of days?

1. Peter Tatchell, a long-time GLBTI activist from Britain, posted an article
on Huffington Post UK talking about how the future of sex will move
beyond straight and gay. Tatchell says, “This picture of human sexuality
is much more complex, diverse and blurred than the traditional
simplistic binary image of hetero and homo, so loved by straight
moralists and – equally significantly – by many lesbians and gay men.

If sexual orientation has a culturally-influenced element of
indeterminacy and flexibility, then the present forms of homosexuality
and heterosexuality are conditional. They are unlikely to remain the
same in perpetuity. As culture changes, so will expressions of
sexuality.”

I couldn’t agree more.

2. Lesbian households produce a child abuse rate of 0%. Awesome. This was reported by Feministing based on a study by the National Longitudinal Lesbian Family Study.

3. Stuff _______people say to _____ people has become a meme I’ve been seeing more of lately, especially on Youtube. TransFix brings you: Stuff cis people say to trans people. Enjoy!

Vanishing Identities?

The elite New York City private school where I teach as
a substitute has a shelf of books outside it library. “Free Books! Help
Yourself!” I check with the librarians to make sure I too can help
myself, and upon their approval, I dive into their collection of
discarded books, no longer a part of the library’s volumes.

    At first, I am elated. A multicultural almanac,
anthologies of famous female athletes, Latin American female politicians
and other diversity-affirming texts fill these shelves. Where to begin?
What to browse, what to take home? As I carry a bulging bag home from
the high school, I begin to wonder: Why are these books being thrown
away? Are these books being replaced by more updates, nuanced social
justice texts? Or are they rendered obsolete in a post-racial society,
in a state where same-sex marriage is legalized? Are these texts no
longer available to questioning and curious students, eager to see their
faces, stories and histories reflected in books?

In an increasingly electronic age, perhaps the library’s volumes no
longer serve the same function. A quick Google search can take students
to virtual communities like The Queer and Now. But regardless of their
utility, books will always be sacred objects, objects that show history.
I hope that the students of this school and all schools will be find
their identities and interests affirmed in print and in school
classrooms.

The L Word: Relevant for Who?

As a Women’s, Gender and Sexuality Studies and American Studies
double major in college, I spend my time analyzing and critiquing pop
culture as a cultural text and artifact. I tore apart Showtime’s The L
Word (2004-2009) for its gender-normative White-washing of queer women’s
lives. Over its six seasons, The L Word presented a Hollywood
stereotyped version of lesbian and bisexual women who were extremely
wealthy, femme, generally White, and almost all cisgender-identified.
 The show portrayed a wide spectrum of sexual expression, but
almost always fetishized that sexual expression and enforced monogamous
relationships. While I know The L Word does reflect a reality for some
members of the LGBTQ community, it displayed a limited lens into the
intersectional identities and deep diversity of LGBTQ people. Plus, it’s
kind of corny.

As a theorist, The L Word will always have a place in my
heart as a text rich for critique. But as a baby dyke, a queer cisgender
woman, The L Word will always hold significance for its role in my
process of discovering my identity. No matter how corny it may be, I am
proud of the show because I relate it with my own coming out, my first
girlfriends, and my own sexual enlightenment.  I am also white and
mainstream LGBTQ representations speak to a dominant (read: White)
narrative. I know that my Whiteness made the show more accessible for
me.

It is through The L Word that I connected with my
girlfriend of four years when she first came out (in fact it was playing
while we first kissed). The L Word helped me learn important lesbian
language and history, as well as stereotypes held by or about lesbians
and bisexual women. It gave me a lexicon, like “dyke” as more than a
hateful word, “U-Haul,” “butch,” and “spaghetti girl” (straight until
wet). The show also introduced me to a culture, the music of Tegan and
Sara, of Peaches, of Goldfrapp, of Heart. Sure, it’s a limited culture
and a limited world, but it was a new and exciting world for me.

A TV show may not be able to change the world, but The L
Word rocked my high school world and invited me into a new culture and
community. Sure, many of the characters were built around stereotype,
but they also had compelling desires that connected me to them. I
connected to Alice Piezecki, a White bisexual writer and bubbly internet
personality. I connected to Jenny, a Jewish woman struggling with
coming out at first and battling mental illness. I connected to Bette, a
woman constantly redefining labels for herself as a multiply
marginalized woman.  It is Alice who drafts The Chart, at first a
hookup map, and later, a tangible textualizing of human connections.

Three years after The L Word ended historically (and with a
whimper, and in a murder mystery), the show feels more distant and less
relevant. However, The L Word is still relevant to my own coming out
narrative and to so many of my relationships (both romantic and
friendships). And it is for this that I will always appreciate it, will
always smile when I hear a Betty song, and will continue to watch,
re-watch, analyze, critique and savor The L Word.